June 8th, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling
Is it just me, or is Tampax’s “Outsmart Mother Nature” campaign wearing a little thin?
These two ads, from the June, 2010, edition of a ladymag, seem lackluster. Visually, they’re just not easy to read.

Serena burns a hole into Mother Nature’s monthly gift? She damages menstruation? How are we to interpret this image?

This one is also a little strange. Cut Mother Nature down to size? Doesn’t this imply reducing one’s period, which is more consistent with the advertising slogans of cycle-stopping contraceptives (e.g., Re-punctuate your life with Seasonique)?
When did the wheels fall off this one, Tampax?

Tags: Celebrities, FemCare advertising, mother nature, Procter & Gamble
Posted in Advertising, Celebrities, Disposable menstrual products, Menstruation | 1 Comment »
April 14th, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling

Kim and Khloe Kardashian examine boxes of U by Kotex.
U by Kotex, which launched last month in the US, has started the next phase of the campaign featuring reality television stars the Kardashian sisters, Kim and Khloe. I’ve seen two press releases about this so far today. The sisters and their mother, Kris Jenner, star in a new “Getting Real With the Kardashians” video series online.
It’s very unusual for celebrities to appear in femcare ads. Although there are a few well known cases of early career femcare ads (Cheryl Tiegs, Susan Dey, and Cybill Shepherd all appeared in print ads before achieving fame in other arenas, and Courteney Cox, later of Friends fame, holds the distinction of being the first person to utter the word “period” in an American television ad for a menstrual product), the only celebrities that have promoted menstrual products after becoming well-known are gymnasts Mary Lou Retton and Cathy Rigby, and actor Brenda Vacarro. All took some heat for it.
The cycle of fame today is much shorter, and arguably narrower. By narrower, I mean that a star might be famous to a smaller segment of the population; to put it another way, I’m not really familiar with the Kardashian sisters and I’m not sure exactly why they’re famous. But I’m not the target demographic of U by Kotex, either. The products are aimed at young women ages 14-24, who presumably ARE part of the audience reached by the Kardashians.
I’ll be interested to see how this affects their careers, and how fans react. Any fans of the Kardashian sisters care to comment?

Tags: advertising, Celebrities, FemCare advertising, Kotex, viral video
Posted in Advertising, Celebrities, Disposable menstrual products, Internet, Menstruation | 7 Comments »
March 2nd, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling
Tags: Celebrities, FemCare, FemCare advertising, misogyny, SNL, television, vagina
Posted in Celebrities, Communication, FemCare, Television | 2 Comments »
February 11th, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling
Tags: advertising, boys/men, Celebrities, FemCare advertising, Men, pads, Procter & Gamble, viral video
Posted in Advertising, Disposable menstrual products, Men, Menstruation | 3 Comments »
January 19th, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling
Guest Post by Heather Dillaway, Wayne State University
First, it was Tampax, and then it was Vagisil. But it’s good they didn’t leave out Summer’s Eve. And I expect Midol (for those irritating PMS-y women) and something about menopausal women’s hot flashes (can’t they control themselves with hormone therapies?) to be next. Although probably SNL writers aren’t savvy enough yet to even contemplate what menopause is or how they feel about it, so they’ll probably stick with skits that revolve around women’s body parts and younger women’s reproductive experiences.
I was frustrated with SNL’s skit about ESPN’s coverage of a women’s billiards tournament, “Tampax to the Max Tournament of Champions” (see my blog post about it). I was disgusted and concerned that SNL writers revised this skit for a second airing, to include a spoof about women’s yeast infections during a Women’s bowling tournament, “Vagisil Superstars of Bowling Tournament”. After seeing the second skit, I (along with many other critics) knew that the power of the skits was not in jokes about women’s menstruation alone but, rather, in jokes about the disgusting nature of women’s bodies more generally. Continue reading...
Tags: Celebrities, Communication, FemCare, guest post, misogyny, SNL, television, vagina, vagisil
Posted in Celebrities, Communication, FemCare, Television | 18 Comments »
January 16th, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling

The feminist blogosphere has been buzzing lately over all the decorations available for ladyparts. We chimed in ourselves on the labia dye, My New Pink Button. Now, via Broadsheet, we learn of “vajazzling”, or bedazzling one’s vajayjay. Actor Jennifer Love Hewitt, star of The Ghost Whisperer, recently announced to George Lopez and his talk show audience that her “precious lady” now “shines like a disco ball” because it is covered with Swarovski crystals.
Note that I used the term “vajayjay” above only because that is the term used by Love Hewitt in advocating the practice of vajazzling. (She says all women should vajazzle their vajayjays, and has an entire chapter of her new book dedicated to the topic.) Perhaps I take things too literally, but I understood vajayjay = vagina, so when I read Mary Elizabeth Williams’ Broadsheet article, I had a lot of questions. Like, WHY? why put crystals in your vagina? No one but your gynecologist will see them! And doesn’t it hurt? Aren’t crystals sharp? And what, exactly, does one use to ATTACH Swarovski crystals?
Of course, Jennifer Love Hewitt isn’t putting crystals in her vagina. She’s decorating her vulva. But cutesy terms like precious lady and vajayjay obscure women’s anatomy even more than Swarovski crystals and pink colorants. Vajayjay entered the pop culture lexicon because network censors would not approve a Grey’s Anatomy script using the word vagina too many times:
Shonda Rhimes, the creator and executive producer of “Grey’s Anatomy,” who brought the word into full public view, never intended to promote a euphemism or slang term for the female anatomy. Rather, she fought to use vagina in the script.
“I had written an episode during the second season of ‘Grey’s’ in which we used the word vagina a great many times (perhaps 11),” Ms. Rhimes wrote in an e-mail message. “Now, we’d once used the word penis 17 times in a single episode and no one blinked. But with vagina, the good folks at broadcast standards and practices blinked over and over and over. I think no one is comfortable experiencing the female anatomy out loud — which is a shame considering our anatomy is half the population.”
When grown men start referring to their penises as “pee-pee” or “winky”, I’ll consider vajayjay an acceptable label for my vulva. As for vajazzling, I’m with Madeleine and the other Lunapad ladies:
At the end of the day, for all the language of self-love and empowerment used in the marketing copy for these products, I still can’t get around the underlying implication that our vulvas are not in fact just fine, thanks, without smelling or looking any different than they already do. To my way of thinking, even planting a seed of doubt of this kind in a woman’s (let alone a girl’s) mind about her bodily self-esteem is to perpetuate a dangerous climate of self-loathing against which most girls and women will struggle at some point during their lives.

Tags: anatomy, Celebrities, slang, television, vagina, vulva
Posted in Celebrities, Communication, Language, Television, anatomy | 3 Comments »
January 15th, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling
Since I am both far too old to follow Katy Perry on Twitter and too completely uninterested in celebrities’ personal lives to read The Huffington Post (WTF? Didn’t HP used to be a political blog?), a friend had to tip me off to the big news that Katy Perry is menstruating and presumably not pregnant.
The image at right is of one of Ms. Perry’s Twitter messages from Wednesday, which reads, “ur gonna make me cry, maybe that’s my period tho. THAT’S RIGHT I’M BLEEDING. Face. Better luck next month peepz”.
As far as I’m concerned, Katy Perry can tweet about her period until the cows come home – hell, that’s what Twitter is for. And in general, the more open acknowledgment that Menstruation Exists, the better for all menstruators. But the comments on the Huffington Post article provide another fascinating study in communication about menstruation. I don’t have enough Sanity Watchers points to read all six pages (and still accumulating) of comments, but I did scan a couple of pages. Most of the comments are along the lines of “TMI” and “It’s gross to discuss that kind of stuff.” One Perry fan posted this remark: “Katy, get pregnant fast so that you can talk about that instead of this.”
Apparently it’s acceptable to talk about the contents of one’s uterus only when it’s full.
[via my buddy genehack]

Tags: Celebrities, Communication, internet, Menstruation, uterus
Posted in Celebrities, Communication, Internet, Menstruation | 2 Comments »
January 10th, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling
This advert for Tampax appears in the February 2010 issue of Marie Claire, and probably other ladymags as well. It shows tennis star Serena Williams posing in a victory stance with clenched fist in the foreground, while security guards cart off Mother Nature, who is bearing a red-wrapped gift for Serena. The legend printed across the picture reads, “Serena shuts out Mother Nature’s monthly gift”.
As I said previously, I have some ambivalence about these ads. In today’s period-hating cultural climate, it takes some courage for a celebrity to appear in advertisement for a menstrual product. And it’s great to see acknowledgement that an athlete can win contests at any phase of her menstrual cycle (even the Boston Marathon).
But look closely at this ad, and read the copy. What’s missing?
That’s right – there’s no mention of blood or menstruation. The word period, itself a euphemism, isn’t even used. Only the flowery, secretive euphemism “Mother Nature’s monthly gift” represents menses.
And Mother Nature is reduced from the clever, wise-cracking Aunt Flo portrayed here to a kooky sitcom aunt reminiscent of Gladys Kravitz. Who wants to receive her gift?

Tags: advertising, blood, Celebrities, Communication, FemCare advertising, Procter & Gamble, sports, Tampax, tampons
Posted in Advertising, Celebrities, Disposable menstrual products, FemCare, Language, Menstruation, magazines | 7 Comments »
November 30th, 2009 by Elizabeth Kissling
Tags: Celebrities, music, performance, periods
Posted in Celebrities, Menstruation | Comments Off
Readers should note that statements published in re: Cycling are those of individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Society as a whole.