Bedsider has jumped on the LARC bandwagon. The online birth control support network for women 18-29 has launched the Works Like a Charm contest encouraging “the awesome women and couples” who use long-acting reversible contraception to share why they love their LARCs for the chance to win up to $2000. This is a variation of the Why I Love my LARC video campaign sponsored by the California Family Health Council last November, only with prizes!
To quote my blog post about the earlier campaign: “Throughout the contraceptive realm, LARCs are being heralded as the best thing since Cinderella’s glass slipper with little acknowledgement that for many women LARCs are more like Snow White’s poisoned apple.”
One long-acting, not-so-reversible contraceptive in particular – Depo-Provera – is causing grief for many women. Yet “the shot” is front and center in the graphic on the contest website.
Considering the rah-rah tone of the Works-Like-a-Charm campaign messages, it seems that bedsider.org, a project of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, is oblivious to the misery caused by this contraceptive. Often, Depo works like a curse.
I acknowledge that Bedsider is doing good work: The website provides youth-friendly, accessible information about the full range of birth control methods. But, in my opinion, any organization that promotes Depo-Provera as a contraceptive method should be totally transparent about the ill effects many women experience both while taking and after stopping the drug.
Depo-Provera, to put it bluntly, fucks with a woman’s endocrine system.
The long list of ill effects while on or after stopping this drug includes: continual bleeding (from spotting to heavy), mood disorders, severe anxiety, depression, digestive issues, loss of sex drive, extreme weight gain (often without change to exercise or eating habits), lingering post-shot amenorrhea, intensely sore breasts, nausea, and ongoing fear of pregnancy leading to repeated pregnancy tests. (Not to mention its documented negative effect on bone density.)
These effects are why the continuation rate of Depo-Provera is only 40-60% after one year of use, and why women are filling online comment pages with stories of their struggles coming off this drug.
At Our Bodies, Ourselves, the blog post Questions About Side Effects of Stopping Contraceptive Injections has been attracting comments since November 3, 2009, with no end in sight.
On my April 4, 2012 re:Cycling post – Coming off Depo-Provera can be a woman’s worst nightmare - there are over 130 comments. All but six were posted since mid-November when the post caught fire. Not more than a day or two goes by before another women shares her story of distress, confusion or frustration. I read each one and respond occasionally. Rarely, a positive experience appears; one criticized other commenters for complaining.
It’s one thing to read or hear about potential ill effects while trying to decide whether or not to use Depo-Provera. It’s quite another to experience some or many of them for months on end without acknowledgement or health-care support from those who promote or provide this drug.
The Works Like a Charm contest website says about LARCS:
Reversible = not permanent. If and when you’re ready to get pregnant, simply part ways with your LARC and off you go.
“Off you go?” Tell that to the thousands of women who are waiting, months post-Depo, to get their bodies and their menstrual cycles back to normal. Most of them still aren’t ready to get pregnant.
I read a blog post about a paper (that I have not read). The post is “Why do women menstruate?“ by PZ Myers, a biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris, blogging at Pharyngula. The paper is “The evolution of menstruation: A new model for genetic assimilation: Explaining molecular origins of maternal responses to fetal invasiveness.” by Emera D, Romero R, Wagner G.
I’m not a scientist and don’t routinely have access to papers like these. Usually, by the time ideas raised in them reach me, they would be solid-feeling facts, authoritative and done — not inspiring questions and wonderings that I can pursue in my way.
They might be about the products that were developed in response to, or as a side-effect of the research, or maybe I’d hear about newly discovered dangers to my health.
Rarely, do I get to be in on the “why.” To think about the story of it–my body–alongside the scientists when they are exploring what might be the origin of, or deciding factors in, why we are the way we are. As human bodies.
(So, thank you, internet. Thank you, bloggers).
This paper (as I understand it via the Pharyngula post) focuses on the conflicting interests of the relationship between a fetus and the woman carrying it: the fetus acting for its survival and development, and the woman as agent for her life, health, and the ability, should she want to, to carry more pregnancies to term.
The research notes a difference among mammals who spontaneously initiate the process of building up the uterine lining, regardless of whether there’s an implanted embryo (like us, with our monthly-ish menstrual cycles) and those who build up the lining only when triggered by an embryo, and asks why do we do this? Why not wait until you need it?
The answer seems to be because you won’t be ready if you wait. Maybe it’s like having guests over last-minute. You might have food and drink enough for all, but you might not. And, you might have stuff laying around that is more personal than you want guests to see. Or, maybe it’s all fine enough. Last-minute is frequently doable, but it’s better to be prepared. Prepared gives you options. Prepared gives you a chance to make it really comfortable and welcoming. Prepared sets you up to have the experience you wanted to have.
Women menstruate to be body-ready to handle the situation of pregnancy in the context of their whole lives, and their family’s whole life.
The monthly preparation of the uterine lining establishes optimal conditions for the relationship, the active give-and-take, between woman and fetus. And, while there are conflicting interests in this shared space of blood and nutrients, I see it as like any relationship between any things living — on a continuum of interaction between self-expressing creatures, cells or trees. There are intricate, elegant processes taking place to make it all happen. There is preparation and desire on both parts — blood, nutrients, and soil, air and water being exchanged and used up among us. There are points of contact, expected and understood, or surprising, or painful, or deadly. We’re in it together for better or worse. All of our relationships are active. Everything is interrelated and contingent and based on routines and cycles. On those we build, change, evolve…
I think only we are impatient about it — want it done faster, with less work and no mess. The stuff of life is messy, though.
For me, when I understand the purpose of the mess, the effort required, the time and attention, become meaningful — I am able to recognize participants (rather than adversaries), to value the work we do and remember the vision and desire that infuse it all.
The Internet abounds with articles, posts and forum discussions about coming off the birth control pill. Women are looking for information and advice. Many are trying to get pregnant, others are just done with hormonal contraception.
It’s a topic that interests many of us connected to the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research (SMCR) because of
how the pill and other forms of hormonal contraception impact the menstrual cycles of the women who take these medications. Some of us are experts in menstrual cycle function and dysfunction, most are advocates for healthy, positive menstrual cycle experiences from menarche to menopause.
A young woman in Paris was looking for advice and comments from other blog readers about how to manage the effects of coming off the pill. Siobhan O’Connor, the blog co-editor, shared Paris girl’s story with a graceful, inclusive invitation to readers:
There’s no judgment—implicit or explicit—on anyone who is on or has been on birth control pills. Some people love them, some people have to take them for medical reasons, some people abhor them. Here, we want to talk candidly about what happens when you go off them. Because, whoa. That can be hectic.
The post drew over 80 comments, with a few coming from SMCR members. What struck me was how many women:
1) had already ditched the pill or were planning to
2) expressed a desire for the return of regular, normal menstrual cycles
3) were concerned about their skin (it often breaks out after quitting the pill).
SMCR member, endocrinologist and guest blogger Dr. Jerilynn Prior answered the concerns about acne and bad cramps in a comment posted on November 22, and included a link to Centre for Menstrual Cycle and Ovulation Research website where readers can find information about all things related to menstrual cycle health.
Holistic Reproductive Health Practitioner Geraldine Matus, another member, commented on November 26 that it was concerns and experiences like those expressed by posters that prompted her and colleague Megan Lalonde to write the guide: Coming Off the Pill, the Patch, the Shot and Other Hormonal Contraception.
I invited No More Dirty Looks readers to visit this blog to learn more about the menstrual cycle and the issues raised by their online discussion.
Regular visitors to re: Cycling know that we cover a broad range of topics, but bloggers frequently address hormonal contraception as it relates to women’s health issues.
Check out this sampling from the re: cycling archive:
- While the 50th anniversary of the pill was, mostly, celebrated in the media, re: cycling offered a different perspective.
- We advocate for better access to non-hormonal methods of birth control.
- Re: cycling answers questions like: Does your birth control stop your cycle?
- We review books and resources that keep women informed about their choices.
- Good, bad and interesting news about birth control methods can be found on this blog
- Guest bloggers offer challenging opinions that get readers thinking.
Several of the women who responded to the Paris girl post at nomoredirtylooks.com expressed eagerness to reclaim healthy, ovulatory menstruation and a willingness to learn how to manage their fertility without the aid of hormonal contraception.
Over the next few months, I intend to explore many aspects of the coming-off-the-pill experience through personal stories, media analysis and interviews with SMCR members with expertise in this area. I’ll include opinion pieces based on my 25 years experience as a pro-choice sexual and reproductive health advocate.
If coming off the pill is a growing trend, then may it be accompanied by a renaissance in women’s understanding of their menstrual cycles.
Lately re:Cycling has featured several posts on menopause, and I have begun to think about the other menopause blogs that might be out there. Turns out there are plenty – maybe not as many blogs as there are about reproductive experiences like pregnancy or childbirth but still a lot. There are even blogs that compile info on menopause blogs such as Menopause the Blog.
If you start searching for these blogs it becomes clear that many talk about hot flashes as a major sign or symptom of menopause (or perimenopause), and offer either strictly biomedical or more natural/alternative remedies for signs or symptoms (e.g., Menopause Symptom Report or I Hate Menopause). Other blogs are written primarily for their comedic value (e.g., Menopause Maniac), support value (e.g., Menopause Goddess Blog), or purely informational value (e.g., Menopause the Blog). (Menopause the Blog does a good job of summarizing some of the major blogs out there, just FYI for those who are interested.)
Many of these menopause blogs conflate the menopause transition with midlife in general (you only have to read a few blog entries to know that women talk as much about the bad and good of midlife as a life stage as they talk about menopause) but some are very specific to menopause. I find it very interesting that there can be so many different kinds of menopause blogs. I also find it interesting that so many of these menopause blogs seem to be trying to work out what midlife as a life stage means as well, which resonates with Paula Derry’s earlier post this week about how little we know about women’s midlife in general.
Perhaps what interests me the most, however, is that all of these menopause blogs seem to be either aligning with or struggling against very negative definitions of menopause. Based on my quick perusal, no blog seems to have moved past or risen above the constant negotiation of biomedical definitions. Even if bloggers are writing about how happy they are at menopause or how much they’ve learned about themselves at this life stage, blog entries still seem to be written in response to negative definitions (or at the very least, in response to the ghosts of negative definitions that still hang around menopause even when it is defined more positively).
To me this means that researchers Antonia Lyons and Christine Griffin are correct in proposing that there is only one “master narrative” of menopause and that women, doctors, women’s partners and children, medical institutions, workplaces, strangers, women’s friends, etc., have no choice but to deal with this master narrative in some way. This also means that Abbey Hyde and her co-authors are correct in asserting that even when women aren’t using biomedical definitions to describe their menopause transition, these definitions still shape women’s perceptions of their experiences.
So, my question is, have others read these menopause blogs? And if so, does anyone have a different take on these blogs? Perhaps I’m being too harsh and using a very specific lens to look at these varied blogs. But perhaps not. What then? If you agree with me, is this what blogs are ultimately supposed to be in the end – a response (be it direct or indirect, conscious or unconscious) to the master narratives in our lives?
It’s been a couple of weeks since we did this, so some of these recommendations are lacking freshness. They’re still good, though.
- New research indicates that chronic endometriosis is a factor in recurring miscarriage.
- In the alphabet of feminism, U is for uterus.
- Stevie Nicks (Fleetwood Mac’s former diva) talks about music, men, and menopause in an interview with The Guardian.
- Although it’s normally recommended only for emergencies, new research suggests the morning-after pill may be safe to use as regular contraception.
- re:Cycling favorite Doc Gurley tells women to boycott menopause for Women’s History Month. Or at least re-name it.
Snow on the ground and subzero temperatures this week, so I’m doing nothing but reading:
- I’ll Show You Mine: Wrenna Robertson responds to the increasing popularity of labiaplasty with a new book featuring close-up, color photographs of women’s vulvas accompanied by personal stories about them.
- Permanent birth control: Bitch reviews the history of voluntary sterilization.
- If every miscarriage is a possible crime scene, used tampons are evidence.
- Research suggests two possible outcomes from making birth control pills available over-the-counter: more consistent usage, and more likely uses of the wrong hormonal formula.
- A bracelet that displays your menstrual status? I grew up in the 1970s, and this reminds me of the mood ring. In more ways than one.
- Advertising copywriter and ad critic Copyranter labels this Italian ad for Tampax “the most sexist tampon ad ever”.
- The FDA has approved a new 3-D imaging system for mammography.
- Between 60% and 70% of tonsil cancers are due to HPV. The virus is also linked to tongue and other oral cancers, and some experts are speculating that an increase in these head and neck cancers among middle-aged Americans is linked to rise in the popularity of oral sex over the past few decades.
- Via CUNTastic, we learned about the practice of placenta crafting.
- Also, P is for Pussy.
- Will contraceptive coverage be included as part of preventive health care under the Affordable Coverage Act?
- A study explores the benefits of using humor to improve chances of conception with in-vitro fertilization.
- Feministe presents the nice pregnant lady’s guide to not offending polite society, in which said society is not very polite.
- Long-time reader Betsy Lavolette asks what we think of MenoPAWS lol cat. Looks to me like recycled PMS humor that was already weak sauce, but judging from the votes and comments on the page, that’s a minority opinion.
- Think Exist Productions is seeking financial support to complete “One More Girl“, a documentary film about side effects and adverse reactions to the Gardasil HPV vaccine (which was marketed with the slogan “One Less”).
- Not your mother’s IUD: National Women’s Health Network explains the risks and benefits of the currently available IUDs.
- Contraceptive implants blamed for hundreds of unplanned pregnancies.
- In Bitch magazine’s blog, The Unbearable Presence of Hair: American Apparel’s Bush Administration. Is the choice not to shave one’s pubic hair now an “ironic” fashion statement?
- Research from scholars at Bristol University suggests a link between depressive symptoms and early menarche. We’re hoping to have a longer post about this research here soon, but for now, here’s the press release about the study.
- It’s well known that hormonal contraceptives have a protective effect against ovarian cancer. Now research studying the contraceptive history of women who had developed ovarian cancer and others who had not developed the disease suggests that all contraceptive use — even IUD and vasectomy — may help protect against ovarian cancer.
- What a surprise — Experts advise taking health news with grain of salt.
- There’s still ten days left to submit a proposal for the 2011 meeting of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research. We’re interdisciplinary, and welcome proposals from researchers in social and health sciences, humanities scholars, health care providers, policy makers, health activists, artists, and just about anyone with interests in the role of the menstrual cycle in women’s health and well-being. Students are encouraged — SMCR often has scholarships to help with travel costs, and awards for top student papers.
- Like many others in the feminist blogosphere, we’re sad to see the demise of Salon.com’s Broadsheet. A Broadsheet story provided the impetus for our very first post at re:Cycling.
A few things that crossed my screen during my week-long holiday:
- Drug companies are becoming expert at using social media to promote pharmaceutical products. Soon, the US FDA will issue guidelines for such usage.
- Current methods of screening for ovarian cancer have not significantly reduced death from the disease.
- Surveys of women in nine countries reveal that “a range of factors influence a woman’s choice of contraceptive”. D’oh.
- The strange case of the disappearing o.b. tampons.
- “I don’t have a 28-day menstrual cycle, and neither should you”: Anthropologist Kate Clancy on the mythology of the 28-day cycle.