Blog of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research

You’re Never Too Young to Wax

September 16th, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling

Via Virginia at Beauty Schooled, who is celebrating her graduation from Beauty U by republishing selected posts, I found this August 24 article about the trend of spas offering hair removal services to increasingly younger clients – starting at age 8.

Wanda Stawczyk, owner of Wanda’s European Skin Care Center in New York, says girls who start waxing young, even before they have dark hair, will always have lighter, thinner hair.

“It’s a very big result,” she tells ParentDish. “The hair is diminished almost 100 percent.”

She advocates for it even more strongly on her website.

“I call it the ‘Virgin’ — waxing for children 8 years old and up who have never shaved before,” the website reads. “Virgin hair can be waxed so successfully that growth can be permanently stopped in just 2 to 6 sessions. Save your child a lifetime of waxing … and put the money in the bank for her college education instead!”

Pediatricians consulted for the article raise concerns only about removal of pubic hair:

Waxing pubic hair if a girl is too young can make it difficult for doctors to tell if a girl is maturing as she should, Williams says.

“We use development of a certain type of hair and distribution of hair as a marker of normal puberty,” she says.

No worries, though. Wanda says her salon doesn’t do bikini waxes on their prepubescent clients:

“Everything but bikini. We don’t want to introduce them to that kind of service yet.”

Regular bikini waxing starts at 14 or 15 for her clients, Stawczyk says. Apparently they missed the latest issue of Cosmopolitan.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Social Effects of Menstrual Pain for Turkish Teens

September 10th, 2010 by Elizabeth Kissling
Illustration via sexualityandu.ca

Illustration via sexualityandu.ca

A new study published in the Journal of Pediatric Adolescent Gynecology reports on a study of how dysmenorrhea affects girls’ relationships with families and friends and school performance for girls in Turkey. Previously, we reported on research documenting that menstrual pain is the norm for adolescents; this study represents a next step by looking at the effects of that pain. 1951 girls from 26 high schools completed surveys assessing the level and the nature of menstrual pain they experienced and answered questions about how their pain affected their school work and relationships.

Unsurprisingly, more than half of the girls surveyed reported that dysmenorrhea does affect their ability to perform well at school, with 50% of the girls reporting “lack of focus on the content of the courses” and 26.9% reporting “not being able to answer the questions in exams despite having the knowledge”.  A staggering 77.3% report “having problems with their families” when they are experiencing menstrual pain.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

The cure for all things menstrual?

December 24th, 2009 by Chris Hitchcock

A recent press release from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists announces that Hormonal Contraceptives Offer Benefits Beyond Pregnancy Prevention. This is in the same vein as similar articles published over the years about “non-contraceptive benefits of the pill” – a laundry list of the many benefits women may obtain by using hormonal contraception. It’s not clear how they should be used by practicing obgyn’s. One use is certainly as additional talking points to convince women who are cautious or reluctant to replace their body’s own menstrual physiology with a pharmaceutical product.

I haven’t been able to read the full document (for some reason my university access seems to only find the first page of the full document), but it appears that, like previous reviews I have read, it is a biased list, including benefits but not risks. Perhaps what is most in common is the sense that a spontaneous menstrual cycle is somehow suspect, that fluctuations over time are unnatural, and that pharmaceutical control is a good solution.

I can understand why the pharmaceutical industry might want to publish a long list of off-label uses (although they would be quickly stopped by the US’s FDA and regulatory bodies in other countries). But it is a curious thing to find a professional group extolling the many off-label benefits of a class of pharmaceutical drugs. Do cardiologists publish practice bulletins about the non-cardiovascular benefits of statins?

There are other perspectives about how one might treat painful periods or heavy menstrual flow. The published Cochrane Reviews (well-respected summaries of published studies) about cramps suggest that the evidence for non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDS, such as ibuprofen) is more solid and clear than that for combined oral contraceptives, and that, to date, no studies have compared them head-to-head. Moreover, NSAIDs also have been shown to reduce menstrual flow.

The press release notes the protective effects against endometrial, ovarian and colorectal cancer, but fails to note the increased risk of sexually transmitted infections. Being on the pill is the most important risk factor for not using condoms.

And when absent or long periods occur, inducing regular and predictable flow will reduce the risk of endometrial cancer, but otherwise primarily serves to mask the underlying issue. In that case, going on the pill can be like hitting snooze on your smoke alarm.

 

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Readers should note that statements published in re: Cycling are those of individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Society as a whole.