Blog of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research

Blood on Screen: The most popular title for menstrual artwork is…

October 14th, 2009 by Giovanna Chesler

A Period Piece

The third film in the Blood on Screen series is Camille Holder Brown’s award winning A Period Piece (2005). I know of at least two other films and one sculptural artwork that use this title. Yet despite the ubiquitous pun, each work has an equally clever take on the cycle (other Period Piece films include a music video by Zeinabu Irene Davis (1991), a documentary by Jennifer Frame and Jay Rosenblatt (1995,) and this installation by LaThoriel Badenhausen which was presented at the SMCR Conference in 2009.)

Camille Holder-Brown’s piece of the cycle is a fictional film portraying the awkward experiences of Sionne, a girl about to begin menstruating. From her earthy sex-ed teacher who gushes about the beauty of the cycle, to her friends and classmates at different stages of menstrual acceptance, to her mother who warmly and carefully introduces her to menstruation, A Period Piece is filled with menses-positive imagery. But Sionne’s overriding fear and her association of menstruation with shame clouds most of the film.

While this negative menstrual imagery may be viewed as harmful to educating girls about the cycle, I see this film as realistic. Though we’d like to believe that all girls are open to seeing their periods and their bodies as positive and beautiful, this is far from the case (see years of Carol Gilligan’s work if you need a refresher on this fact.) A Period Piece greets many girls where they are at and it can work to begin a conversation with a young girl who is unable to open up to a well-meaning elder. Please contact production company Cinemomma directly for your copy and watch the trailer here: http://www.cinemomma.com/

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Of the womb: That’s hysterical

October 13th, 2009 by Elizabeth Kissling

Blogger Abby Jean has a great post up today at the new Feminists with Disabilities blog about the etymology of the word hysterical, and how it is used against both women and people with disabilities.

The word itself is derived from the Latin word hystericus, meaning “of the womb,” and from the Greek word hysterikos, meaning “of the womb, suffering in the womb,” from the Greek word hystera, meaning “womb.” And they understood the uterus to be the direct cause of hysteria.

[. . . . ]

So when someone on a blog tells me to chill out because it sounds like I’m hysterical about an issue,  the etymological meaning is that my failure to put a baby in my uterus (which has independent will and agency inside my body) has caused it to become angry, loose itself from its mooring, and start floating around inside of my body until it bangs into my brain and starts making me unreasonably upset.

[. . . . ]

When I am told I am hysterical, there is both 1) the implication that I am excessively or unreasonably emotional AND 2) the implication that my condition is unique to my femaleness. It’s also 3) implied that hysterical statements (or even statements from hysterical people) should be discounted and hysterical people need to change in order to participate in the discussion, or should be removed from it entirely.

There’s really sharp analysis and insight here, and an obvious connection to our work here at re: Cycling. As the kids say, go read the whole thing.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

A Critique of SNL’s Recent “Ladies Billiards” Skit: “Tampax to the Max Tournament of Champions”

October 13th, 2009 by Elizabeth Kissling

Guest Post by Heather Dillaway, Wayne State University

Screenshot

Screenshot

Trying to find a reason to stay up late this past Saturday night, I found myself watching Saturday Night Live for a few minutes. Unfortunately I tuned in right before a skit called “Tampax to the Max,” a skit within which two male SNL actors played sports announcers for a “Ladies’ Billiards” competition. Drew Barrymore and SNL’s Kristen Wiig played the two billiards players, but the skit wasn’t really about the billiards tournament at all. The skit was written specifically to highlight Tampax as a sponsor of the billiards event and, therefore, the skit was filled with superfluous tampon jokes and random interjections of the word “Tampax” (which, of course, brought the most laughs for the skit). Putting all other comments aside about the perpetuation of gender inequality in sports as well as all of my feelings about how ridiculous Drew Barrymore and her SNL counterpart (Kristen Wiig) were made to look in this skit, I think that we cannot just sit by and let this skit air without commenting about the place of menstrual products (and, by default, menstruation itself) within it. On one hand, this skit was simply a way for some SNL writer to air some really bad Tampax jokes and allow male actors on SNL to get a chance to say “Tampax” as many times as they could within one skit. In this context, perhaps some could characterize this skit as harmless. Yet, on the other hand, menstruation and women’s activities surrounding menstruation become a complete joke in this skit as a result. The inferences made about the connections between menstrual products and women’s sports are strange (Is Tampax what everyone thinks about when they watch women’s sports events? And are the sponsors more important than the actual sports event, if it is a female sports event? And is it more fun to think about women’s menstruation than to watch women compete?).  The fact that the billiard players’ place within the skit becomes shadowed by their menstrual products is maddening, however. The skit makes clear that women’s involvement in billiards (perhaps sports in general?) is unimportant but their use of menstrual products is much more interesting to men…

While I understand that SNL makes light of all different kinds of bodily processes (and that IS funny at times), the underlying equations of women with their reproductive processes and the laughs gotten from the pure mention of Tampax in this skit are disturbing. As I watched this skit, I couldn’t help thinking about why we haven’t moved on from laughing about menstruation and menstrual products.  As we all know, jokes often let us know exactly how unequal the world is and, in my opinion, letting male SNL actors just get a chance to make some random Tampax jokes in a skit is not doing women or reproduction or menstruation any good at all. Does menstruation become any more positive or any more well understood because of this skit? I don’t think so. I was offended by this skit, and would be interested to hear if I was the only one who was….

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

This is What Menstrual Activism Looks Like

October 12th, 2009 by Chris Bobel

Wow. Chella Quint, UK-based real live activist, posted this 40 seconds of brilliance [by filmmaker Lindsey Keith] on her blog recently. I caught the bug and hope to spread it around. No menstrual taboo? Uh…. Then why is this short film positively hysterical?

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

On the need for another kind of health care reform

October 12th, 2009 by Elizabeth Kissling

Via Women’s Health News (a very useful blog maintained by medical librarian Rachel Walden), I learned of My OB said WHAT?!?. This site tracks appalling, offensive, and a few downright abusive things OB-GYN practitioners have said to their patients. A few examples:

“…Because your cervix is lousy.” -OB to mom not in labor at 40 weeks, explaining why an induction is necessary, after a vaginal exam indicated no dilation.

“Holy Sheep Shit, Batman!” -OB Specialist to mother after reading a late third trimester ultrasound documenting the baby’s head measurements.

“I give all women episiotomies so it looks prettier down there.” -OB to patient who stated she didn’t want an episiotomy.

Strictly speaking, this isn’t menstruation news. But the misogyny, disrespect for patients, and objectification of women’s bodies documented here is certainly connected to the attitudes toward menstruation and menstrual etiquette we’ve written about here at re:Cycling. As Ms. Walden wrote in linking to this site, I wish these stories were fictional but sadly suspect they’re for real.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

The Etiquette of Menstrual Concealment Preserves Pain as well as Secrecy

October 9th, 2009 by Elizabeth Kissling

abdominal_painIt’s great that menstrual taboo and stigma is ‘over’, as Amanda Fortini informed us earlier this week (see Chris’ post about the menstrual activism shitstorm across several blogs this week). Now maybe all those women suffering from debilitating endometriosis can get some relief.

Kate Seear’s newly published study about the diagnostic delay in treating endometriosis finds that menstrual etiquette rules and the culture of concealment are among the most profound causes of the delay between the first experience of menstrual pain and the diagnosis of endometriosis, which then opens avenues for relief through either surgery or medical treatment. The delay is non-trivial: research estimates an average delay of 8 years in the UK and 11 years in the US. Reasons for the delay include minimizing of menstrual pain by doctors, family members, and others, and women’s inability to distinguish between ‘normal’ menstrual pain and abnormal pain, and, Seear argues, the social sanctioning women experience when they talk about menstruation in general or menstrual pain in particular.

Copyright restrictions prevent me from re-publishing the article that details her findings and analysis, but here is the abstract:

Endometriosis is a chronic gynaecological condition of uncertain aetiology characterised by menstrual irregularities. Several studies have previously identified a lengthy delay experienced by patients between the first onset of symptoms and eventual diagnosis. Various explanations have been advanced for the diagnostic delay, with both doctors and women being implicated. Such explanations include that doctors normalise women’s menstrual pain and that women might delay in seeking medical advice because they have difficulty distinguishing between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ menstruation. It has been suggested that the diagnostic delay could be reduced if women were trained in how to distinguish between ‘normal’ and ‘abnormal’ menstrual cycles. In this paper I argue that whilst these may be factors in the diagnostic delay, women’s reluctance to disclose problems associated with their menstrual cycle may be a more significant and hitherto neglected factor. I argue women are reluctant to disclose menstrual irregularities because menstruation is a ‘discrediting attribute’ (Goffman, 1963) and disclosure renders women vulnerable to stigmatisation. Women actively conceal their menstrual irregularities through practices of the ‘menstrual etiquette’ (Laws, 1990) which involves the strategic concealment of menstrual problems. This argument is supported through an analysis of the experiences of 20 Australian women diagnosed with endometriosis. The ramifications of this analysis for chronic pain conditions more generally and for practical strategies designed to address the endometriosis diagnostic delay are considered.

If you have access to an academic library (or other source for Social Science & Medicine), I highly recommend reading this article.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Human Mate Choice and the Pill

October 8th, 2009 by Chris Hitchcock

In a review article in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution, University of Sheffield researchers Alexandra Alvergne and Virpi Lummaa [1] present a range of evidence that using oral contraceptives influences women’s preferences for mates, and men’s sexual interest. Some of the research shows that women’s preference for human odors while taking the pill are for odors from men who are more likely to be close relatives, with similar variants of the majorhistocompatibility locus (MHC), but that women who are ovulating prefer odors from men who are less similar. There is speculation that the degree of similarity in the MHC locus may affect fertility.

Further evidence comes from a study by Geoffrey Miller and colleagues, looking at men’s willingness to pay professional lap-dancers for sexual access over the menstrual cycle. This was a difficult study to do, and assumed that ovulation occurred on a standard day during the menstrual cycle, which we know is not valid, because women vary in ovulatory timing and may not ovulate in otherwise normal menstrual cycles. Nonetheless, the average curves for women selling sexual access through lap-dancing show a menstrual pattern in profits that is strikingly similar to the pattern of estrogen over the menstrual cycle. Women taking oral contraceptives both made less money, and did not show the same pattern as those who were naturally cycling.

Men's willingness to pay for sexual access to lap dancers by menstrual cycle day. From Miller (2007)

Men's willingness to pay for sexual access to lap dancers by menstrual cycle day. From Miller (2007)

There is further work that needs to be done here to connect all of the dots, but the information is interesting and points to an unsuspected role of the menstrual cycle in women’s (and men’s) lives.

What I would like to know is this:
1. How much of a difference does the degree of MHC similarity make to the average couple’s fertility? Are those who are similar in MHC overrepresented in fertility clinics?
2. Is there an effect of odor preferences on what we think of as “chemistry” in a relationship? On conflicts and marital harmony? On sexual behaviour? I am thinking of some of the excellent work done by John Gottman in Seattle, analyzing couple interactions and predicting relationship success. Do couples who start on the pill differ from those who don’t? Does that relationship dynamic change when pill use changes?
3. What happens when a woman stops using oral contraception? Do her preferences change? How (if at all) does that show up in the relationship?
4. And what about other relationships where odor-based mate choice is blocked, such as internet dating? Are there similar issues?

The bigger picture for me is this – science knows very little about the many roles and effects of the naturally cycling menstrual cycle, and replacing that naturally occurring cycle with oral contraceptive pills is likely to be having other effects that we will come to know in the future.

Control over our own reproduction is a very important part of women’s rights, health and well-being. However, oral contraceptives are not the only effective method of birth control. In addition to a variety of rare but serious side effects, they also leave women at risk of sexually transmitted infections, interfere with peak bone acquisition in younger women, and are the highest risk factor for young men not using condoms during intercourse. Perhaps it is time to rethink the wisdom of widespread and routine use of oral contraceptives, and to recognize the value and the unexamined effects of the menstrual cycle.

Putting the ‘Men’ in Menstruation

October 8th, 2009 by Elizabeth Kissling

Guest Post by David Linton, Marymount Manhattan College

pms_buddyA lot of ideas get hatched in a bar over drinks with friends. Most don’t make it past the sober morning after.  But a conversation in a Denver bistro in 2008 led to the creation of a new Internet service that aims to address Rodney King’s eternal question, “Can’t we all just get along?”  In this case the “getting along” applies to men and women who feel afflicted by the scourge of Pre-Menstrual Syndrome – PMS – and its presumed negative impact on otherwise harmonious relationships.

Despite the sound research and persuasive arguments of writers such as Carol Tavris (The Mismeasure of Woman), Anne Fausto-Sterling (Myths of Gender), Joan C. Chrisler (Charting a New Course for Feminist Psychology) and Paula Caplan (Fighting the Pathologizing of PMS), to name just a few who have labored to dispel the pernicious misconceptions and stigma surrounding the menstrual cycle, stereotypes and myths have been tenacious.  Thus, in the digital age it was probably inevitable that PMS Lore would find new outlets for dissemination.  Which brings us back to Denver.

One of the participants in the fateful exchange over Coors and coolers in the Mile High City was Jordan Eisenberg, a self-described entrepreneur.  He and a group of friends had somehow gotten into a spirited conversation about PMS.  The women expressed annoyance that men sometimes asked, “Are you getting your period?” as a way to discredit feelings women had about real concerns.  It was so bad, they said, that even if they actually were menstruating, they could never acknowledge it because they’d be dismissed out of hand.

Opinions bounced around until one of the men mentioned that he put the date of his girl friend’s expected period in his Palm Pilot so he could anticipate her mood swings and avoid topics that might provoke conflict on “those days.”  The men thought that this was a sensible idea, and the women were outraged that anyone would track their biology so mechanically.

For all but one of the participants the evening’s outing yielded no more than another story to share with friends at some future bar gathering.  But for Jordan Eisenberg it was an inspiration.  And so was born the Web site PMSBuddy.com.

In no time at all, the site has become an Internet hit.  It can be found as an iPhone application and comes up under a number of Google search terms. Within a year of its launch, the site claimed to have 150,000 registered users and that it was currently tracking (as of 10/5/09) 33,192  menstrual cycles.  According to the daily tally 1,366 women whose cycles were being tracked began to have PMS that day.   Another 6,437 would begin within five days and the “Overall Threat Index” was “1-4:1,” whatever that means.

One might view the site as just a “guy joke,” another way for men to make light of something they don’t understand and to cope with their menstrual fears.  The PMSBuddy web site uses fairly benign language and claims to have good intentions.  It even has what it calls an “altruistic” aim with a slogan that boasts, “Saving relationships, one month at a time!” yet it reflects an underlying anxiety.  It addresses male subscribers in a chummy voice: “PMSBuddy.com is a free service . . .to keep you aware of when . . . things can get intense for what may seem to be no reason at all. . . .there is no reason to ever be blindsided by PMS again.”
In addition to tracking the cycles of women in the lives of its subscribers and sending warning announcements about the impending periods of one’s wife, girlfriend, daughters, etc., it has a section called “PMS Stories,” submissions from subscribers about their PMS encounters and opinions.   On the first day I first looked at the site there were nearly 150 stories posted from both men and women, but by the time these pages are being read there are surely many more.

When You Hit a Nerve…..

October 7th, 2009 by Chris Bobel

bloody_lips3 features in 4 days

160 comments plus another 120 plus another 39 and still they post...

MENSTRUAL ACTIVISM has hit a nerve!

On Friday, The Guardian published a story on menstrual activism which featured a photograph of a woman with *menstrual blood* on her lips (a piece by artist Ingrid Berthon-Moine). And there was a complementary article published in the same issue (an honest first person narrative about shifting menstrual attitudes).

Both articles generated a lot of comments–much of them negatively focused on the photograph. Liz Kissling responded with a great retort on this blog.

Then on Monday, following up on The Guardian piece, writer Amanda Fortini argued on Salon.com’s Broadsheet that the menstrual taboo is a thing of the past.

..shock, panic, fingerpointing (those stupid feminists are barking up the wrong tree), namecalling (I think someone actually called me, by association, “Professor of the Faculty of Useless Studies”) disgust (eeeewwwwww),  outrage…..the gamut.

There were stretchy analogies (as in, that’s a STREEEEEETCH  (see: excremental activism)), tragic anecdotes run amok (since I am cool with my period, that means EVERYONE ELSE is) and plenty of  superficial “we’ve come a long way, baby” analyses that seemed forged in a vacuum, and more.

There were also plenty of folks keeping it real and making darn good arguments confirming the menstrual taboo’s persistent hold and why we should care. If you are one of those posters reading this post right now—thanks for speaking up!

There’s more than a denial of the taboo in the Broadsheet piece; there is also a dismissal of the seriousness and value of the work of challenging the menstrual status quo.  We clearly need to educate a LOT of people of the importance of looking at menstruation as a key issue in its own right AND as a window into the patriarchal (and capitalist) shaming and controlling of women’s bodies.

The need for the blog is surely affirmed by the response to these three pieces.

Here’s the letter I wrote to Salon/Broadsheet today.

____________________

Menstruation is a biological reality.

How we respond to it is a tangled web of social constructions that tell us a lot about what it means to be a woman in our culture.

When I began studying menstrual activism 6 years ago, that’s what piqued my interest, but I wasn’t long in the field before I discovered something the menstrual activists have always known.

Menstrual activism is part of a complex and enduring project of loosening the social control of women’s bodies, of working to move women’s bodies from object to subject status—something absolutely foundational to taking on a host of feminist issues, from human trafficking to eating disorders to sexual assault.

It may not be obvious at first (and, hmmmm, might that be because we are socialized to not look too closely “down there”?) but menstrual activists, whether using humor or shock or the promotion of scholarly research, reveal how women internalize destructive messages about womanhood including notions of our bodies as messy, unruly things (yes, things) that need to be tidied up, medicated, plucked, smoothed and trimmed. This exhausting (and expensive) quest for the perfect body replaces the search for good quality information about how the body works and how to keep it healthy and strong.

Menstrual activism critiques the gendered commodification of the body (and this applies to everyone, not only biological women), and leads us to ask some tough questions about what we take for granted. What can we learn about our cultural value systems when we examine “quiet wrappers so your period stays private,” skin lightening creams (the fairer, the better) and steroid abuse among teen boys? Who benefits from these values-in-practice? Who suffers?

Irritating Women Since Time Began

October 6th, 2009 by Elizabeth Kissling

Who knows everything about the world, is fluent in every language, and knows all your secrets?

That’s right – it’s The Period Fairypfairy. This amusing caricature was created by Stephanie Crippen-Myrick to bring a little levity to menstruation. The first episode of the PF’s new video series is online here.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

It’s In The Blood

October 3rd, 2009 by Elizabeth Kissling
Image via livejournal.com menstrual activism commmunity

Image via livejournal.com menstrual activism commmunity

I was quite excited to see our own Chris Bobel and Giovanna Chesler quoted in this piece from The Guardian about menstrual activism, and then to discover that the Guardian published a second piece the same day about menstruation: Rowena Davis explains What My Period Means to Me. Kira Cochrane’s article about menstrual activism provides a broad, useful definition of the term, and several examples, ranging from avant-garde artworks to Rachel Kauder Nalebuff’s collection of menarche stories to Chris’ forthcoming book about third-wave feminist activism and menstruation.

It seems that menstrual activism (otherwise known as radical menstruation, menstrual anarchy, or menarchy) is having a moment. The term is used to describe a whole range of actions, not all considered political by the person involved: simple efforts to speak openly about periods, radical affronts to negative attitudes and campaigns for more environmentally friendly sanitary products.

Davis’ essay is a personal one, describing the transformation of her negative attitude toward her own period to one of not only acceptance but appreciation of menstruation for the opportunity it provides to reflect:

[T]hese days I can’t wait for the next one – really! Like the women in The Red Tent, I use it as a time to slow down, rest and check in with myself. ‘What’s happened in this last chapter of my life?’ I ask myself. ‘What is my body telling me?’ If I’ve had a bad month where I’ve been suppressing tension or working too hard, my period is much heavier and more painful. It’s a sign that I haven’t been listening to my needs.

My enjoyment of these articles was marred, however, by reading the comments from Guardian readers. The vitriol is staggering. There are offensive remarks equating menstruation with elimination and menstrual blood with feces, admonishments to women to keep silent about their periods, criticism of the Guardian for publishing such “twaddle”, and rebukes to feminists for concerning themselves with something as trivial as women’s bodies. I think it’s that last one that disturbs me the most; modern feminism owes a great deal to the second-wave concept that the personal is political. As we have documented elsewhere in re: Cycling and the work of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research, it is not menstruation that oppresses women. But attitudes toward women and menstruation and the communication and silences regarding menstruation can be oppressive. To draw upon one of my favorite theorists, Simone de Beauvoir, menstruation does not make women the Other; it is because she is Other that menstruation is a curse.

Just as the penis derives its privileged evaluation from the social context, so it is the social context that makes menstruation a curse. The one symbolizes manhood, the other femininity; and it is because femininity signifies alterity and inferiority that its manifestation is met with shame. (The Second Sex, p. 354)

Menstrual activist Chella Quint told Cochrane says that she plans to continue writing “Adventures in Menstruating” until it is time for Adventures in Menopausing instead, “but, of course, it would be great if I didn’t have to, if there was no shame whatsoever”.

Likewise, the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research will continue our work until it’s no longer necessary.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) Edits Out Menstrual Moment

October 2nd, 2009 by Chris Bobel

Guest post by Laura Wershler, Sexual Health Access Alberta

Canadian comic, Elvira Kurt, broke the menstrual silence taboo on Friday, September 25, on Q, “Canada’s liveliest arts, culture and entertainment magazine”. Q, with host Jian Ghomeshi, airs weekdays on CBC Radio One.

During her weekly appearance on the show, Elvira started off by saying that she and Friday Live guest artist Jann Arden had been having a laugh fest backstage. Jann is a singer/songwriter with a notorious sense of humour. Elvira said that she’d laughed so hard she felt like she was going to get her period early and that she could feel her uterus contracting. She followed that with this comment – but wait.

I wanted to share this public menstrual mention with re: Cycling blog readers by posting a link to the podcast of the September 25 episode. But something strange had happened. To get to the bottom of it, I sent this letter to Q’s host:

Dear Jian,
I tuned in Friday, September 25th to hear your interview with Jann Arden. Loved her new songs. But the real delight for me was hearing Elvira Kurt bring a little menstrual cycle humour to the show. I could hear you blushing when she noted that you looked like you were ovulating. Now being an ardent menstrual cycle advocate I was hoping to share the clip with my friends and colleagues of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research. You can check out the society’s blog re: Cycling at www.menstruationresearch.org/blog/.

You can imagine my disappointment when I re-listened to the podcast to pinpoint the exact minute of Elvira’s period moment only to find – that someone at CBC chose to edit this bit from the podcast.

Why Jian? I will try to refrain from making assumptions about why Elvira’s 30 seconds of menstrual cycle humour went missing from the podcast, if you can offer an explanation about who made this decision and why. Kudos to Elvira for breaking the silence around menstruation. The podcast edit suggests CBC made a decision to silence her. Oops! Sorry. That was an assumption.

The menstrual cycle is a fascinating topic – why not a show about it on Q? We can bring Elvira back to share her take on the podcast edit.

I can report that I have not as yet received a reply to my letter. And after listening to the show every day since sending it, I am also able to report that it has not been read over the airwaves, let alone given “letter of the day” honours by Jian. The menstrual silence continues.

The ironic thing is that Elvira’s weekly spot on Q is called the “Cultural Hall of Shame”. She nominates two inductees each week. I can’t help but think that the CBC podcast editor should be her next nominee.

Ever the rabble rouser, I also wrote to Elvira through her website. I told her the escapade would be mentioned soon on this blog. No word back from her either.

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Readers should note that statements published in re: Cycling are those of individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Society as a whole.