<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who in their right mind wants to read about menstruation?!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/10/27/who-in-their-right-mind-wants-to-read-about-menstruation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/10/27/who-in-their-right-mind-wants-to-read-about-menstruation/</link>
	<description>Blog of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:06:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Online Book Store and News - Period. Question mark.</title>
		<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/10/27/who-in-their-right-mind-wants-to-read-about-menstruation/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Book Store and News - Period. Question mark.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menstruationresearch.org/?p=1152#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] go?&#8212;and money issues&#8212;why is toilet paper free in a public restroom and tampons not?Redbook is getting some heat for asserting that most women would rather gorge on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] go?&#8212;and money issues&#8212;why is toilet paper free in a public restroom and tampons not?Redbook is getting some heat for asserting that most women would rather gorge on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snub THIS. &#171; Adventures in Menstruating</title>
		<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/10/27/who-in-their-right-mind-wants-to-read-about-menstruation/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Snub THIS. &#171; Adventures in Menstruating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menstruationresearch.org/?p=1152#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] got to talking about this again today (don&#8217;t miss the comments), and Sarah and I have put together our own response. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] got to talking about this again today (don&#8217;t miss the comments), and Sarah and I have put together our own response. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elissa Stein</title>
		<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/10/27/who-in-their-right-mind-wants-to-read-about-menstruation/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Elissa Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menstruationresearch.org/?p=1152#comment-93</guid>
		<description>With a prepackaged wipe, to make sure everything stays shower fresh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a prepackaged wipe, to make sure everything stays shower fresh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bobel</title>
		<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/10/27/who-in-their-right-mind-wants-to-read-about-menstruation/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bobel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menstruationresearch.org/?p=1152#comment-92</guid>
		<description>And from now on, your subscription arrives at your house in a &quot;specially-designed rustle-free wrapper&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And from now on, your subscription arrives at your house in a &#8220;specially-designed rustle-free wrapper&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chella</title>
		<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/10/27/who-in-their-right-mind-wants-to-read-about-menstruation/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Chella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menstruationresearch.org/?p=1152#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Chris, haven&#039;t you heard? Redbook are allegedly about to rebrand themselves as &#039;Mysterious, Euphemstic Blue Liquid&#039;Book!

Chella</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, haven&#8217;t you heard? Redbook are allegedly about to rebrand themselves as &#8216;Mysterious, Euphemstic Blue Liquid&#8217;Book!</p>
<p>Chella</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Kissling</title>
		<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/10/27/who-in-their-right-mind-wants-to-read-about-menstruation/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Kissling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menstruationresearch.org/?p=1152#comment-85</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see what kind of reception &lt;em&gt;FLOW&lt;/em&gt; gets in other ladymags. Historically, REDBOOK has positioned itself as a magazine for young, modern, married women and tried to carve a space in between the group of magazines such as &lt;em&gt;Good Housekeeping&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Ladies Home Journal&lt;/em&gt;, which skew toward an older readership, and the other ladymags for young single women, such as &lt;em&gt;Cosmopolitan&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Mademoiselle&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Glamour&lt;/em&gt;, etc. So with REDBOOK indicating its readers aren&#039;t so modern, I&#039;ll be curious to see what the other ladymags say.


&lt;small&gt;(Yes, I have an unhealthy interest in magazines of all kinds. Don&#039;t judge me.)&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see what kind of reception <em>FLOW</em> gets in other ladymags. Historically, REDBOOK has positioned itself as a magazine for young, modern, married women and tried to carve a space in between the group of magazines such as <em>Good Housekeeping</em> and <em>Ladies Home Journal</em>, which skew toward an older readership, and the other ladymags for young single women, such as <em>Cosmopolitan</em>, <em>Mademoiselle</em>, <em>Glamour</em>, etc. So with REDBOOK indicating its readers aren&#8217;t so modern, I&#8217;ll be curious to see what the other ladymags say.</p>
<p><small>(Yes, I have an unhealthy interest in magazines of all kinds. Don&#8217;t judge me.)</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
