<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Pharma Used Ghostwriters to Promote HRT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/08/05/big-pharma-uses-ghostwriters-to-promote-hrt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/08/05/big-pharma-uses-ghostwriters-to-promote-hrt/</link>
	<description>Blog of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:58:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Kissling</title>
		<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/08/05/big-pharma-uses-ghostwriters-to-promote-hrt/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Kissling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menstruationresearch.org/?p=242#comment-15</guid>
		<description>We now know for sure that ghostwriters have been used in medical journal articles for all kinds of pharmaceutical products, Leslie. Did you see this recent piece in the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/11/business/11ghost.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ghostwriting Is Called Rife in Medical Journals&lt;/a&gt;? Apparently some editors are now trying to take a stand: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000156&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PLoS Medicine published an editorial&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/18/business/18ghost.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this piece ran in the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; on Thursday&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now know for sure that ghostwriters have been used in medical journal articles for all kinds of pharmaceutical products, Leslie. Did you see this recent piece in the <em>New York Times</em>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/11/business/11ghost.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss&#038;pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">Ghostwriting Is Called Rife in Medical Journals</a>? Apparently some editors are now trying to take a stand: <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000156" rel="nofollow">PLoS Medicine published an editorial</a>, and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/18/business/18ghost.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss&#038;pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">this piece ran in the <em>New York Times</em> on Thursday</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Botha</title>
		<link>http://menstruationresearch.org/2009/08/05/big-pharma-uses-ghostwriters-to-promote-hrt/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Botha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://menstruationresearch.org/?p=242#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Not only did Big Pharma hire Ghostwriters for HRT - but they also did it for
Gardasil.  So if they have done it for these two products - one can assume that
ghostwriters have written about other products as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only did Big Pharma hire Ghostwriters for HRT &#8211; but they also did it for<br />
Gardasil.  So if they have done it for these two products &#8211; one can assume that<br />
ghostwriters have written about other products as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
